Talk:Chang'e 6

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chang'e 6 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Chang'e 6 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 4 June 2024.

Wikipedia

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Moon task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

IcubeQ(Siyuan-2)[edit]

The IcubeQ(Siyuan2) is jointly developed by both China and Pakistan. So, it would be better to include both their names in the statement. Please, give your opinion and suggestions related to it. 2402:8100:2735:2F2B:5CED:32F0:B269:6D80 (talk) 16:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How will the sample be returned?[edit]

The article discusses the collection of lunar samples and explains they were launched into lunar orbit but it doesn’t explain how they will be collected from orbit and returned to earth? Does anyone have reliable sources on how that is planned that can be added to the article? 2600:1700:975E:E000:80F:7E2:C0C2:2E79 (talk) 08:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

china number one[edit]

china number one 98.240.113.219 (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Category: Low-importance Astronomy articles[edit]

I suggest, the category low-importance astronomy articles should be removed. It's the first time in human history with a sample return from the backside of the moon. A sample return from this unexplored area is a potential threat and could be an offense against planetary protection. So - it is likely a high-importance astronomy article. -- 80.146.191.213 (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

backside

hohohohohohohahahahaha

hehehehe .. 98.240.113.219 (talk) 04:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I generally agree with your historic significance reasoning, but might be better to wait a bit. I was actually about to ask on the Talk page whether it's necessary to mention to readers in the lead or as an extra chapter about the potential importance of a mission to retrieve far side samples. Such a mission could potentially answer key questions about the origin of the Moon and the solar system, and confirm or debunk longstanding theories.

[1][2] While nobody can predict the future, the mission could lead to significant scientific discoveries, or it might not. So, I'm unsure if it's appropriate to mention potential findings while it's still an ongoing story. Perhaps it's best to wait and see what scientists learn, which is just a matter of time. If major discoveries and breakthroughs are made from the samples, there would be every reason to highlight its importance, given its profound impact on the history of astronomy.[3] 49.179.73.15 (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]