Talk:ChangeFIFA

Football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality / notability concern[edit]

This article appears to be a coatrack for criticism of Sepp Blatter. All of the reliably sourced material relates to either Blatter or FIFA, rather than this organisation's activities. I have searched for reliable sources discussing ChangeFIFA itself; the only result I could find was this blog piece by David Conn for The Guardian, which relates more to the views of Damian Collins MP. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of coatracking need substantial justification, since they imply bias. However, the organisation ChangeFIFA has been established to challenge the whole FIFA structure and functionality. It follows that one of its primary criticisms would be directed to Sepp Blatter who's FIFA's president since 1998. It would be a little strange if it were otherwise! We're not here, as editors, to judge whether ChangeFIFA is correct in its assertions or not; only to present information about it and its actions. -The Gnome (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you are talking about would belong in a criticism of FIFA or a history of FIFA article, not here. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ChangeFifa itself, as an organisation, has been set up in "criticism of FIFA!" Criticism of FIFA as it's currently run is ChangeFifa's very raison d'être. Take away ChangeFifa's criticism of Fifa and Sepp Blatter and there's little else left.

If we had a "Criticism of FIFA" article on Wikipedia, there would be, most probably, a request to merge it with "ChangeFifa!" -The Gnome (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ChangeFIFA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ChangeFIFA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902154938/http://worldfootballinsider.com/Story.aspx?id=34242 to http://worldfootballinsider.com/Story.aspx?id=34242

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]