Talk:Charles A. May

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCharles A. May has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 29, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 17, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that before a cavalry charge, Charles A. May told his soldiers, "Remember your Regiment and follow your officers!", which today remains a motto of the 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment?

Sources[edit]

nice job, have two references that may be portrait, but not available online: [1][2] pohick (talk) 17:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

quibble, you say "the enemy commander" General la Vega, but he was "one of Mariano Arista's commanders, Brig. Gen. Rómulo Díaz de la Vega".[3] (p.25)pohick (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I clarified the statement. Strikehold (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate?[edit]

The NYT obituary says Aug. 9, 1818, but the reference is not directly from the NYT, but a genealogical site, so it may be suspect (e.g. it may have been copied into text by hand or OCR, either of which is prone to error). The Freemasons directory says Aug. 9, 1817.

The "Heroes of the War of 1812" book says 1812.... This is the only source I've found so far that is an original document which gives his birth year. The NYT obituary and Freemason directory were both copied, probably by OCR, which could conceivably mistake a "2" for a "7" or an "8". Strikehold (talk) 23:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Charles A. May/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Intro is not really substantial enough for a GA bio - should be a couple of paras covering the main points described in the body of the article.
  • Fix for this pending. I will expand it within the next few days. Strikehold (talk) 08:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, I expanded the lead. Please have a look and let me know what you think. Strikehold (talk) 02:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Perhaps I've missed something but don't see anywhere that the Battle of Monterrey, noted in the infobox, is referred to in the body of the article.
  • You are right. Most of the sources didn't go into too much detail on his involvement there, but I found a mention of where his unit fell in the order of battle. I added a section on this battle. Strikehold (talk) 08:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  3. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Generally images in infoboxes are restricted to a size of 200px or so; seen some 180px and some 250px but recommend 200.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Aside from these points, the article looks very good, and if you can address these in the next week or so I'll have no prob passing as GA.

One minor style issue that doesn't have a bearing on passing or not, the word "served" is repeated in quick succession in After the Mexican War, May served in several different parts of the American frontier, including California,[15] New Mexico,[16] and Texas.[17] He served with the First Regiment of Dragoons in the Kansas Territory... Could the second occurrence be altered to say "attached to" or some such to avoid the repetition?

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That all looks fine - passed and well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Charles A. May. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Charles_A._May&oldid=1208886459"