This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Recent edits concerning asserted military rank[edit]
I know that Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit but a cornerstone of Wikipedia-editing is consensus. That means we discuss things. That means we discuss MOS:FULLNAME, that means we discuss content and referencing and word-choices and assume good fath about our fellow editors. Failure to engage in consensus-building is a sign of disruptive editing, and a symptom of not here to build an encyclopedia. Please stop your present pattern, please engage your fellow editors in their concerns - continued failure to do so will be regarded as disruptive editing and eventually vandalism. Shearonink (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I know that Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit but a cornerstone of Wikipedia-editing is consensus. That means we discuss things. That means we discuss MOS:FULLNAME, that means we discuss content and referencing and word-choices and assume good fath about our fellow editors. Failure to engage in consensus-building is a sign of disruptive editing, and a symptom of not here to build an encyclopedia. Please stop your present pattern, please engage your fellow editors in their concerns - continued failure to do so will be regarded as disruptive editing and eventually vandalism. Shearonink (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)