Talk:Charles Henry Smyth Jr.

Charles Henry Smyth Jr. has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 14, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Charles Henry Smyth Jr. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Woodrow Wilson convinced Charles Henry Smyth, Jr., to leave Hamilton College for Princeton University?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/February.

Wikipedia

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Charles Henry Smyth Jr. is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Charles Henry Smyth, Jr./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 15:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give reviewing this a shot. Wizardman 15:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

I'm presuming you've looked for a free image of him rather than a fair use. The infobox pic is fine as is but given when he was most active I'd be surprised if there's not a PD image out there.
"Charles Smyth, Jr., married" comma not needed there.
"His courses in petrology and chemical geology introduced students to subjects that were relatively new in the United States but nonetheless important for careers in mining." I'm not sure if the second part is necessary; it's not in the ref and, while I'm sure true, feels a bit tacked on.
Commas are needed for "In [year]..." starts to sentences.
"of the challenging region." not sure if challenging is needed, getting a bit into editorializing territory.

I'll put the article on hold and pass when the issues are fixed. Wizardman 03:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the writer is semi-active. Given this and the fact that it's pretty close to GA status, I'll let this stay on hold for a while if need be. Wizardman 15:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your patience in conducting this review. I'll address each of your points in sequence.

The image may well be public domain. I found it in the Proceedings of the Geological Society of America for 1937. It's in the public domain if the GSA didn't renew its copyright on the Proceedings, which I suspect they didn't. But until I knew for sure it seemed safest to assume otherwise and assert fair use. It was the only picture of him I found during an exhaustive search of sources.
How about this?
Fair enough; removed.
I can't find any reference to this in the MOS, but it's not worth fighting over. Changed.
The obituary noted the value of Smyth's contribution given how difficult the region was to work in. Unfortunately I don't have the Proceedings in front of me (it's not a trivial process to get one's hands on a copy, even briefly), so I can't be more specific than that. I do think it has bearing on evaluating his impact and skill as a geologist, so I think it has a place in the article.

Thanks again for your patience. Work has demanded more of my time lately, but I should be available in two days' time in case you'd like to iterate again. Lagrange 613 04:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fixes look good, so I don't have further concerns. When you do have time next, try to look into whether or not Proceedings had their copyright lapse; it's not a huge deal but it would make everything in the article fully free then. Article now passes. Wizardman 02:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]