Talk:Charles Scott (governor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleCharles Scott (governor) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 22, 2018.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 17, 2009WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
January 18, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
March 23, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
June 23, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
May 30, 2020Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 28, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Kentucky governor Charles Scott served as chief of intelligence for George Washington during his later campaigns in the American Revolutionary War?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 22, 2019, and October 22, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

date of birth[edit]

His date of birth differs from the one at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 14:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the birth date to 1739. Findagrave says 1739, the Kentucky Encyclopedia says 1739 (probably April), and the Kentucky Department of Libraries says April 1739. Lamont A Cranston 18:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 4, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: article is clear and concise and free of grammatical and spelling errors
2. Factually accurate?: article is well-sourced and all statements that require references have them
3. Broad in coverage?: article is complete
4. Neutral point of view?: no POV problems
5. Article stability? article is stable
6. Images?: images are free

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Argos'Dad 03:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?[edit]

I'm translating this article to Chinese, now got this:

  • "As tensions between the U.S. and Great Britain escalated in the wake of the June 22, 1806, Chesapeake–Leopard Affair,"

Is this a typo as Chesapeake–Leopard Affair occurred at June 22, 1807?--Jarodalien (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarodalien: Just double-checked the source, and it is indeed a typo. Thanks for the catch. I changed it. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 15:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the follow up. BTW, translation done about an hour ago, personally I feel this one is a little bit rely on one source, but still a fine article.--Jarodalien (talk) 16:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Scott (governor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:James Wood (governor) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace[edit]

So where was he born then? --MarchOrDie (talk) 06:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MarchOrDie: Does this refer to the mismatch between the text and the infobox? The text is almost verbatim what is said in the Dictionary of American Biography. The Kentucky Encyclopedia confirms "present-day Powhatan County". Not sure where Cumberland County came from. I want to make sure I am trying to fix the right issue before I make changes. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 17:12, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Rather surprising that the article made it to the Main Page with this inconsistency. --MarchOrDie (talk) 19:44, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@MarchOrDie: Thanks for catching this. I'm not sure where the mention of Cumberland County came from, but I've corrected the infobox to be consistent with the article, which is well-cited. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 14:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]