Jump to content

Talk:Charles Strum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Strum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk19:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Charles Strum, the obituaries editor of The New York Times, seldom employed the terms "first" or "last" in an obituary to eschew issues with contradictory testimony? Source: The Wall Street Journal: "Mr. Strum lays down the law about accuracy and dresses down relatives who bollix the facts. Because obituaries are written on deadline, they often spur contradictory testimony from family members, resulting in more than a few corrections. One trick of the obit writer to avoid trouble: Rarely use the words "first" or "last" …"
  • Reviewed: Bruges speech
  • Comment: Eligible per Rule 1d, because it is only scheduled to appear in the "Recent Deaths" section of ITN and not as a bold link.

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • This article is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no policy issues, except for a sentence that was close-paraphrased and which I rewrote. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]