Jump to content

Talk:Charles Townshend, 8th Marquess Townshend

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

The Marquess Townshend is a high ranking British Peer. He only succeeded to the title last week so the info. still needs expanding. All his predecessors in the title have wikipedia articles.

Jwasanders (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think just the title meets WP:GNG, but will remove the CSD and convert it to a WP:PROD, once you think the article meets the WP:GNG then remove the WP:PROD. Codf1977 (talk)
I have removed the prod on the basis that I think he's sufficiently notable. I realise being a peer isn't necessarily notable in itself, but he's a peer in his own right rather than a courtesy peer, and he's very senior. Looking at the List of Marquesses, all but a handful of the thirty-five current ones have their own page, and I suspect that the ones that don't have generally acceded to their titles only recently (although I admit I haven't checked!). I note also that it's sourced and therefore fulfils the criteria for retention set out in the new sticky prod (BLP) guidelines. If others disagree, I suggest nominating for deletion via AfD and it can be discussed further. Thanks! talkGiler 16:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with listing references for heir's marriage

[edit]

I have tried listing sources, but Wikipedia claims that I am spamming. I tried tinyurl, which made things worse. I don't have time to keep fixing this. I used to be a contributor under the name "Wikibiohistory", came back, only to discover this new policy. I really cannot produce online references if this continues. I wanted to update this page, but if this policy continues, why bother? Really very very frustrated at the end of 15-20 minutes of work. Wikibiohistory2 (talk) 14:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Townshend, 8th Marquess Townshend. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]