Talk:Charlie Gardiner (ice hockey)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Fantastic. I've just made a few MOS changes and a couple of minor typos, but otherwise it meets all the GA criteria. It could do with an image, and otherwise I would suggest a peer review to see what further expansion could be made. I think it's too short to push for FAC at this stage. Well done.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Thanks a lot for the quick review and pass!!! (Dear lord, that was so much more painless than the last GA review we did :p) As for images, I can't find any free ones. Perhaps a check in the Canadian archives might land an image that used to be under crown copyright. For length, the reason the article kinda short is because Gardiner played only seven seasons, and his life and career almost certainly wasn't covered by the press as much as a goaltender of similar calibre would be today (for example, Martin Brodeur). But to improve this article, I'd say finding a free image for the infobox is important. Maxim (☎) 23:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)