Talk:Charlton-on-Otmoor

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal to delete redirect to Otmoor[edit]

Why does Charlton-on-Otmoor redirect to Otmoor? Otmoor is a large area of open land with considerable historic and ecological interest, and its article should be developed with relevant content. Charlton-on-Otmoor is a village on one edge of the moor, the "Otmoor" article contains almost no content about the village, and it would be confusing to add any.

Charlton is the largest of the "seven towns" of Otmoor. Most of the seven already have their own articles. Charlton is the only one that has a redirect to "Otmoor" instead. Charlton deserves its own article like every other village. I propose that this redirect be deleted so that one of us can create a proper article about Charlton-on-Otmoor village. Motacilla (talk) 11:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou to Qwfp for deleting the redirect and creating a stub article. I have expanded it and removed the "stub" tag. Motacilla (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Charlton-on-Otmoor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110813070319/http://ccgi.coledaleweb.force9.co.uk/cgi-bin/charlton.php to http://ccgi.coledaleweb.force9.co.uk/cgi-bin/charlton.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlton-on-Otmoor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090911065817/http://www.charlton-on-otmoor.oxon.sch.uk:80/ to http://www.charlton-on-otmoor.oxon.sch.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]