Jump to content

Talk:Chaudhry Abdul Majeed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Request edit

[edit]

Education section: With regard to association with the ICTP, ICTP historical statistics indicate that Chaudhry Abdul Majeed visited ICTP during 1985, 1989, and 1991. He was a regular associate and not an associate professor as mentioned in article. The reference to the information provided (note 2: Albright, David; Holly Higgins (April 2003). A Bomb for Ummah: The Others) leads to a 404 error.

Footnote 5 takes you to an article that does not contain anything resembling the quote in the text. ----

I'm copying these to number them for responses
  1. Education section: With regard to association with the ICTP, ICTP historical statistics indicate that Chaudhry Abdul Majeed visited ICTP during 1985, 1989, and 1991.
  2. He was a regular associate and not an associate professor as mentioned in article. The reference to the information provided (note 2: Albright, David; Holly Higgins (April 2003). A Bomb for Ummah: The Others) leads to a 404 error.
  3. Footnote 5 takes you to an article that does not contain anything resembling the quote in the text. ----
  1. For the first point, I'm not sure that I understand your point. What change are you requesting? If it's to add information, do you have a source or sources?
  2. Yes, you are so right, that link is a dead link and I cannot view it via wayback either. Your point about professional development and the nature of the work makes sense. Without a source to clarify things, my recommendation is to change "At ICTP, Majeed taught advanced courses in chemistry and mathematics as an associate professor." to "At ICTP, Majeed taught advanced courses in chemistry and mathematics." -- removing "associate professor" out of the discussion. -- I have made that edit, please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Done
  3. Footnote 5 - Yes, I see your point. It appears that this should all be removed. The final quote was in the source, but it does not seem appropriate to be in the article. -- Done
I think that this is all that needs done, again, please let me know if you have any further comments. Thank you for posting the edit request.--CaroleHenson (talk) 08:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Closing the request: Item 1 does not appear to be a request, Items 2 and 3 were completed. If there are any further changes, please feel free to submit a {{request edit}}.--CaroleHenson (talk) 10:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]