Talk:Chelsea (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HĐ (talk · contribs) 11:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Lead

• "It was issued to" → sent to

 Done

• "features a melody, similar to that of" → a melody that is similar to...

 Done

• "generally mixed reviews" → mixed reviews only

 Done

• Link music critics

 Done

• music critics, who

 Done

• "who compared it to the works of Gwen Stefani and Blondie, but found it to be a "weak" debut single" → the two clauses do not have opposite meanings/claims, what's with the "but" conjunction?

 Done

Composition

• "late 80s and 90s" → 1980s and 1990s

 Done

• "ode to jealousy, begin[ning] with [a] Eurhythmics-style synth before launching into a snarling, almost-tough chorus." → try to paraphrase this claim

 Done

• The Billboard review says it is a bubblegum song, perhaps bubblegum pop?

 Done

Commercial reception

• After its release, "Chelsea" was moderately successful → "After its release" sounds superfluous

 Done

• "faired" → you mean "fared"?

 Done

• was able to peak → weird wording

 Done

• The rest of the article: short, concise, and well crafted
•  On hold for seven days. P.s. @Carbrera: Could you mind having a look at this GAN? Thanks — Simon (talk) 09:28, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

• @HĐ: I have replied to all of your concerns and changed the article accordingly. Thank you so much for the review! Carbrera (talk) 03:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)