Talk:Chetaka
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chetaka article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 16 November 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 21:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
King Chetaka → Chetaka – king not required -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 13:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. — Music1201 talk 16:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support we usually do not include titles or honorifics in the article name. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸(talk) 19:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support; dropping the "King" part is standard WP naming. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 10:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Indian history articles
- Low-importance Indian history articles
- Stub-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Jainism articles
- Low-importance Jainism articles