Jump to content

Talk:Chew Valley Lake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleChew Valley Lake is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 3, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 12, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 12, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 2, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
September 27, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
February 6, 2021Featured article reviewDemoted
September 24, 2021Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Older comments

[edit]

I have cleaned this up a very little bit, and removed a few peacock terms such as "outstanding natural beauty". it still reads rather more like a tourist flyer than an encyclopedia article to me. DES (talk) 16:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IS "Area of Outstanding NB" a DEFRA designation?Rich Farmbrough 14:54 5 March 2006 (UTC).
AONB is designated by the Countryside Agency on behalf of Uk government Rod 17:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some clean up & tried to remove the flowery language - can anyone help with further clean up or can I remove the clean up tag?Rod 16:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the ISBNs in the bibliography are incorrect. All ISBNs should be 10 or 13 digits without spaces. Joe D (t) 22:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the bit about "No spaces" is correct. I thought that the spaces are important parts of the ISBN, i.e. 1 234 56789 0 is a different ISBN from 1 2345 6789 0. Can you point me at a source which says they should be omitted? SP-KP 22:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The ISBN pages suggests they're redundant, and AFAICT the Wikimedia software (and most/all?) online bookstores omit them. Joe D (t) 22:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They are, I believe, redundant, but not meaningless. 1st group says the language, second the publisher, third is a serial, fourth is a checksum. When you're into it, you can "read" a seperated ISBN. Rich Farmbrough 14:53 5 March 2006 (UTC).

snipe

[edit]

This should probably be Common Snipe, Gallinago gallinago, but if it is intended to include Jack Snipe, that is not a Gallinago species, jimfbleak 08:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - corrected Rod 09:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article

[edit]

I don't know why the featured article star isn't coming up at the top of the page. I tried to fix it but I don't want to over edit the page with something that might not work. So if someone would fix that, that would be great. RENTAFOR LET? 04:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

map needs scale added. --Duk 07:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Denny Island

[edit]

As I'm not sure why the following addition was made, I moved it here:

For Denny Island, the small island in the Severn estuary, see that article.

- User:Docu

File:Mallard in flight.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Mallard in flight.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FA tune-up

[edit]

Rodw: Hi! I've stopped in because we are re-assessing our oldest FAs to ensure they meet modern FA standards. This article is in great shape for a featured article from 2006, though—you have clearly been keeping an eye on it—so I've just made a few very small fixes. The only issues I see are some deadlinks that might be replaceable (see [1]). Thank you for being the rare nominator that is still watching his articles 8 years on! (and n.b. - the Valley article will soon be up for the same informal tune-up as well). Maralia (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments - was it really 8 years ago. I've fixed or replaced some of the deadlinks & it has made me feel I need to go and check some of the other FAs I was involved in years ago.— Rod talk 20:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the quick action on the deadlinks! Everything looks good, so I'm going to cross this one off the list and move on to the Valley article. Maralia (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chew Valley Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chew Valley Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chew Valley Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA criteria

[edit]

Large parts of the article have no references, failing verifiability requirements in the FA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 03:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodw: are you able to bring this to WP:WIAFA current standards? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved house and am no longer local which also means I don't have access to all the resources (this also applies to Chew Valley) so unless someone else takes it on, then probably not.— Rod talk 08:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]