Talk:China–Portugal relations

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the China–Portugal relations article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biased

Their atrocities at Ningpo and Macao, and their subsequent servility, had opened the eyes of the Celestials to their true character , and unfortunately for other European adventurers, they had come to the conclusion that all western nations were alike. - Is it just me or things like "true character" and "unfortunately" doesn't belong in a historical description and in Wikipedia? even more when the reference is a recollection of memories from the 19th c. and written by englishmen, who were therefore biased especially when regarding other europeans and their presence where they ment to be of influence. I would recommend a profound rewrite or full deletion of that section. E-roxo (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a POV tag. Very biased indeed. Obviously who wrote it, had clear political inclinations, in order to negativelly affect relations between both countries possibly due to the Portugal-China-Lusophone Africa-Brazil partnership established sometime ago. But can we save something out of it? It needs major rewritting, it is even written as an opinion.--Pedro (talk) 00:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a profoundly unbalanced and sensationalistic mess in dire need of an overhaul ASAP. The "Ming Dynasty" section should be broken down into 1513-1522 (arrival of the Portuguese until they were banned), 1522-1557 (period of exclusion until the foundation of Macau), and 1557-1644 (until the end of the Ming dynasty). A period between 1509-1513 (first contacts between Portuguese and Chinese in Malacca) should come before that. Relations between Portugal and China during the Qing dynasty were also obviously not limited to the Chinese arresting some hooligans unaffiliated with the Portuguese state. Wareno (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on China–Portugal relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007082822/http://shanghai.cultural-china.com/html/Latest-news-on-World-Expo/World-Expo-News/paticipation/200812/10-2428.html to http://shanghai.cultural-china.com/html/Latest-news-on-World-Expo/World-Expo-News/paticipation/200812/10-2428.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]