This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article should not be speedy deleted as it is a notable topic covered extensively in RS. --FailedMusician (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Following me around Wikipedia to delete everything I write is harassment. You did not even bother to give any reason why you think it is a "POV fork". FailedMusician (talk) 13:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is for the closer to decide, but if you want an explanation as to why this is a POV fork, we have an article on the opioid epidemic in the United States, this just seems like a listing of people who have blamed it on China. leaving aside the OR. Slatersteven (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your presence here, following a dispute on another page and a ANI post, amounts to harassment (see WP:HARRASMENT). Moreover, the secondary sources I've included clearly demonstrate the subject's notability, making it a content fork. FailedMusician (talk) 13:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion article is well sourced. No POVFORK observed. SmolBrane (talk) 15:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FailedMusician I think the article is well sourced but why do you think this content cannot be included in the main article? Why does it deserve a stand alone article? {{u|Gtoffoletto}}talk 18:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is already mention of China in the main article, and it needs some expansion, but the article is already very big and this would seem out of scope there. FailedMusician (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
