Talk:Chloe x Halle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 3 August 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved... during the discussion, by the nom. I will discuss with them, but the result is good, just the process needs a little tidying up. Noted that the discussion was not unanimous as to the target but I assess that a very rough consensus has been achieved. Andrewa (talk) 17:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Chloe X HalleChloe x Halle – Nearly all references to the duo refer to them as Chloe x Halle, without a capitalised 'X' TheKaphox (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to Chloe × Halle; the correct character when using an X-shape as a conjunction is that symbol, not a lower-case x. A capitalize X is the worst option, however.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  08:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It appears the title is at Chloe x Halle already, which is IMO the best option. For the record, I oppose using the "×" symbol proposed above; it's an obscure symbol on the wiki (from what I can tell it only appears once, as a hatnote on multiplication sign) and I believe it is very unlikely readers will use it to find this article. Lower-case "x" is supported by reliable sources and is probably the WP:COMMONNAME. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Added advert template[edit]

Key phrases include "jaw-dropping covers", "YouTube sensations", "already prolific young duo", etc. The entire article needs a stylistic rewrite but that's the biggest issue. IgnominiousIbex (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you pls ban this racist slave queen pic! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.29.189.60 (talk) 06:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting the "Filmography" and "Awards and nomination" section[edit]

As their film career keeps growing each day, I think we should split the "Filmography" section into a new page. I also think the "Awards and nomination" section needs to splits into a new page so this page is not filled with their growing list of accolades. 110.136.154.214 (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I personally believe that neither of the two sections you mentioned is big enough to need a split. However, I would be in favour of splitting Chloe Bailey and Halle Bailey and keeping the Chloe x Halle page strictly for music, while following the format and layout of actor-musician sister duo Aly & AJ (with Aly Michalka and AJ Michalka). I'm bringing this up because I think that they're beginning to star in separate roles. I also suspect that after the release of The Little Mermaid (upcoming film), the general public will want to research Halle Bailey and Halle Bailey only. HeyitsBen talk 10:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I support this idea of splitting Chloe Bailey and Halle Bailey into separate pages. By splitting the page, the topic of the article would be more focused and would make it easier for the general public to research each topic of interest. Shawnkline💬 11:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I support splitting into two biographies. Chloe x Halle is a musical entity, but the two members are also individual actresses that aren't necessarily related to the music group. They both have enough notable work as individual actresses and can be split into two articles, making them easier to identify for public search. Fejkxk (talk) 13:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do you read Chloe x Halle[edit]

The article should say it 2806:2F0:6120:2361:84E8:8E5E:D325:C648 (talk) 00:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]