Talk:Chocolate bomb

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chocolate bomb article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in December 2014.

Explosives Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate bomb → Chocolate bomb (firecracker) – Most hits turn up a chocolate dessert. Dougweller (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest PROD or AFD, sources do not show notability. 2601:D:3080:EA2:ECFA:CF4B:BEB1:170C (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think perhaps a hatnote pointing readers who may be looking for the chocolate variety of a Bombe (or bomb) might be enough here.--Yaksar (let's chat) 21:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - no idea what "sources do not show notability" above means, since evidently plentiful sources in India, but the dessert is a more likely search outside India, the kind of cultural divide where (firecracker) only helps. A third topic Chocolate Bomb (cocktail) seems to exist only on websites, not in books. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, we don't have an article related to the chocolate cake definition and, in any case, Wikipedia is not a menu (directory) and isn't known as a food guide. I just did a pre 01/01/2000 search on "CHOCOLATE BOMB" and found most results either for the firework or explosive bombs. These are the primary topics and people knowing of the existence of the cake this interesting. Gregkaye ✍♪ 04:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Gregkaye, doing a search only for stuff over 14 years old doesn't seem helpful. Current searches on Google and Google books show the vast majority going to the dessert. Dougweller (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dougweller, I think that it demonstrates possibilities related to points of reference from which the cakes/deserts were named. Again there is no article named after the cake and the current article, I think, rightfully holds the basic name space. Again I think that people looking for chocolate bomb the cake may be interested to note the existence of this content. I don't have any great objection but don't see valid reason for change. Gregkaye ✍♪ 10:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update - Guys, I may have messed up a bit. Above I said that the recipes that dominate google search results are largely types of Bombe glacée, often just called bombes or bomb. However, I just made more of an effort than just looking at the pictures and noticed that the dishes that the recipes are about are instead much more diverse. It seems that it's instead just pretty tempting to call any dish that is round an filled with chocolate as a "bomb" -- it is, after all, a fairly exciting (and I guess accurate) description. I don't know if that changes anything, but it does make me a bit more comfortable in saying that the current state of the article with a hatnote is fine.--Yaksar (let's chat) 15:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are enough resources to cite notability of chocolate bomb, the firecracker. Not a candidate for PROD or AfD. Regarding the move, I think hatnote is fine. BengaliHindu (talk) 07:30, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.