Talk:Choir dress
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Choir dress article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Winter choir dress?
[edit]The caption (and filename) of the main picture in the article describes it as showing "Summer" choir dress, but the cappa magna he is wearing has ermine lining, which was only worn in winter. Am I missing something here? MishaPan 17:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
House of Lords
[edit]Do Church of England bishops and archbishops wear choir dress in the House of Lords? Opera hat (talk) 11:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- They do (or at least they used to) for the Opening and Closing of Parliament and similar occasions, and I understand that the bishop on duty as chaplain does so all the time .
--Jpacobb (talk) 19:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
It's a small point, but the cuffs on a bishop's choir cassock are red not purple. 65.189.11.83 (talk) 11:30, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Concerns about the Anglican Section
[edit]To say that the choir habit was required in 1552 is potentially misleading: the BCP in 1552 required only the surplice, no tippet! To say that "in theory" BCP 1559 "permitted" the traditional vestments is also misleading. BCP 1559 either required their use or alternatively their being retained until instructions for their disposal were issued. For details of the debate see the Ornaments Rubric art. which I have also linked on the main page. I should prefer: "... the Elizabethan Prayer Book of 1559 included the so-called Ornaments Rubric, which could be understood as requiring the pre-Reformation eucharistic vestments, though there is little evidence that it was so interpreted at the time". Apart from the cope, which was definitely allowed in cathedrals and collegiate churches by the Canons of 1603/4, is there any evidence for the use of the traditional vestments in the 17th century? The problem from 1559 through to the end of the 17th century seems to have been securing the use of the surplice by puritans who thought it "too roman". Cassock, gown and tippet are no longer specified as outdoor habit for Anglican Clergy in England. I can probably reference all this, but would like any reactions first --Jpacobb (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for these comments. References for this would be extremely helpful. --Furfur (talk) 12:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Oriental Choir Incorrect
[edit]Syriac priests do not wear cassocks as choir - they wear a ghooltho (known as a jibbee or mashlah in Arabic), which is an outercassock similar to that of the byzantines except split in the middle and smaller sleeves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.70 (talk) 21:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Choir dress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060208161350/http://dappledphotos.blogspot.com/2005/12/mozzetta.html to http://dappledphotos.blogspot.com/2005/12/mozzetta.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120601010112/http://www.st-joseph-foundation.org/cfd17-2.htm to http://www.st-joseph-foundation.org/cfd17-2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Not a monsignor
[edit]Per the 2023 Annuario Pontificio, Fr. Giles Wach no longer holds the rank of monsignor (a member of the papal household). This fact should be taken in account in the caption for his picture. 2600:1700:F8A0:47E0:D161:A574:E733:773B (talk) 07:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class fashion articles
- Unknown-importance fashion articles
- Fashion articles needing attention
- B-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- B-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- B-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- Low-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- B-Class Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- Low-importance Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- B-Class Anglicanism articles
- Low-importance Anglicanism articles
- WikiProject Anglicanism articles
- Christianity articles needing attention
- WikiProject Christianity articles