Talk:Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 November 2018. The result of the discussion was delete and redirect.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gemology and Jewelry: Jewelry Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Jewelry subpage.

Companies Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (284)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (998)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,345) • Stub-Class articles (6,691)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (403) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,260)

Articles for creation

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 4 November 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

[no title][edit]

Appreciate that you can review this page, thanks.

Notable company per WP:LISTED. Some of the refs that were manually numbered seem to be lost and shoild be restored. Legacypac (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is not copyvio - I checked that. I also recall the refs were there before but with manually inserted numbers. I rewrote some portions to fix english and reduce repetition. Legacypac (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not really[edit]

To editor Legacypac: I make a case that the subject isn't notable. Please clean up the citation artifacts in the meantime. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well as a public company listed on the Hong Kong Exchange, they are notable per WP:LISTED and they are a major subsiderary of a large notable private conglomerate Chow Tai Fook. There is a fanatic idea that no company is notable and any mention is advertising, but say a person who appears at an Olympics but is never heard from again is auto notable. This needs to change. Public companies, in this case a multinational with around 90 years of history, impact thousands of investors, employees, suppliers, and pension fund beneficieries. This is real life important not some silly pokemon charactor. Legacypac (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You take a different reading from LISTED, because it does not presume notability for companies. "There is a fanatic idea that no company is notable and any mention is advertising, but say a person who appears at an Olympics but is never heard from again is auto notable." This is a WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument. I agree, Wikipedia is really inclusive towards athletes. When NATHLETE is rewritten I will gladly join in the purge. Meanwhile, I stick to what the community has decided. Also, you'll note that I don't edit fanboy stuff like Pokemon. If these weak arguments are the best you have, you ought to rethink editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest rereading WP:LISTED and considering that WP:N is supposed to be the standard across the site. Therefore if an athlete qualifies for a page under N then absolutely a listed company with far more available info qualifies. Legacypac (talk) 13:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect?[edit]

This could be merged with Chow Tai Fook whose main content is about the jewellery group already. Theroadislong (talk) 20:13, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]