Jump to content

Talk:Chris Kilham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Large sections of well-cited neutral information were deleted

[edit]

User Anetode deleted large sections of information. This information was well-cited and neutral. Biography represents expert “Notable” within Wiki guidelines. I request that these user changes be reverted.

Large sections of well-cited neutral information were deleted

[edit]

User Anetode deleted large sections of information. This information was well-cited and neutral. Biography represents expert “Notable” within Wiki guidelines. I request that these user changes be reverted. JK Greenberg (talk) 20:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This information did not adhere to a neutral point of view as it was of an advertorial nature. It appears to have been added by someone with a clear conflict of interest and it should be re-written. More to the point, a lot of the information presented had more to do with Kilham's research findings than biographical information. While a summary of his research is certainly appropriate to the article, it should be incorporated in a summary style different from the kind I removed from the article. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

[edit]

While working on fixing reference warnings, I noticed that this article seems somewhat promotional. There also is a number of questionable claims, some possibly pseudoscience, but without any critical review, or information about those not being necessarily supported by modern medicine. There also may be too many links, and not enough reliable secondary source references. PaleoNeonate (talk) 18:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Kilham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]