Talk:Christian politics in New Zealand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evangelical Christian politics in New Zealand?[edit]

Shouldn't this be renamed 'evangelical' Christian politics in New Zealand? It omits discussion of mainline Protestant and Catholic involvement in New Zealand politics.

[[User: Calibanu] 10.55, 08 May 2006

I agree. There is also no mention of the involvement of mainstream churches in the Maori rights movement. That is a major omission. The Angel of Islington 06:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More information on those things would be great, I agree. When I created the article, I focused on things like the Christian Coalition because that's what I knew about, not because I though it was the only thing relevant. That said, I suspect that the article will always contain more about evangelical activities than mainstream Protestant or Catholic activities, simply because the evangelical elements have typically been more explicit about linking religion to politics. (For example, the section on political parties doesn't mention any explicitly Anglican, Catholic, or Presbyterian parties for the simple reason that so far as I know, there haven't been any. People of those denominations have been more likely than the evangelicals to see themselves as "a politician who is Christian" rather than "a Christian Politician".) But anyway - the more the article covers, the better, definitely. -- Vardion 08:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please update this to include the Vision NZ/CoalitionNZ offshoot of Destiny Church. Add to the chart. 122.59.247.172 (talk) 04:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Have made a start. (and moved your post down; in line with normal practice) - Snori (talk)

Exclusive Brethren[edit]

May I suggest that the Exclusive Brethren be added to this article given their involvement in the NZ 2005 general Election.Mombas 08:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added as a see also section. It's always good to add a link to something that should be mentioned in the article to see also (or create one, as I did here). The section on New Zealand should provide a good foundation for writing about them here. Richard001 10:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Religious support for National and Labour[edit]

The Article states christians are more likely to support National yet the figures I have seen have Labour attaining 31.5% of the "regular churchgoer" vote in 1999 compared to National's 20.2%, while in 2002 Labour captured 30.6% comppared with National's 14.4%. It appears that the claim National is the favoured choice for Christians is a stretch unless Prostitution reform in 2003 and the Civil Union Bill of 2005 has reversed the ration. Perhaps if someone had access to comparable statistics for the 2005 election it would enable a more accurate generalization of Chritian voting patterns. SOurce is R. Miller, Politics and Government of New Zealand, 4th ed. 2006. -- HistoryKiwi —Preceding comment was added at 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to these tables from the NZ Election Study website, the gap had certainly closed by 2005, and may have reversed. They show 31.5% of Christians voting Labour, and 30.3% National. The "regular churchgoer" figures there seem to include non-Christian religions, but they show National leading among weekly worshippers, with 32.2% against Labour's 23.5%. -- Avenue (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above comment, the change in gap is unlikely to be necessarily due to the social policies of national but in the large swing to the nats in 2005. I think this should simply be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.69.232.218 (talk) 05:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reforming the article[edit]

Given the title, I intend to flesh out some of the non-evangelic aspects over the next little while. (Feel free to help!). It may be that an "Evangelical Politics in New Zealand" article will need to come out of this at some point, but it would be nice for this current article to have a good fair coverage of the whole field. Snori (talk) 23:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Christian politics in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Christian politics in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flowchart image updates[edit]

The flowchart image can do with some updating, to reflect the name change of the Conservative Party, more new parties, and the fact that Vision NZ has the same founders as Destiny NZ. What app was used to create the chart?

Deepred6502 (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]