Talk:Chronemics

Encyclopedic tone

This article is a genuine field of study, with roots going back to at least 1980. (Chronemics and the Verbal-Nonverbal Interface) The word isn't in spellcheckers, Harper's Online Etymology Dictionary, or indeed other online dictionaries. But it isn't a coy independent invention for some student project.

...No one would know that from the tone of much of the article, or the previous chatter on the Talk page (see Archive). This should be the first priority for anyone tackling this. Yamara ✉ 21:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chronemics&action=edit#

I've done a little cleanup. The article actually has plenty of inline citations (mostly Harvard style), so I changed the warning template to "Tone". It's still badly suffering from lack of style. Yamara ✉ 02:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Edited out/around some of the worst style examples, but plenty remains for the intrepid. Yamara ✉ 02:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chronemics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140916070715/http://www.peacecorps.gov/media/forpress/news/781/ to http://www.peacecorps.gov/media/forpress/news/781/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): VictoriaWarembourg.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 22 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kristalerma653.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Badly written and insensitive

Much of this article is uncited and comes off as personal anecdotes, or worse stereotypes of human cultures. Not to mention the tone and style of the article is out of line with the majority of Wikipedia. Did this just slip through the cracks for the past 7+ years? Squevin (talk) 07:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

This article could benefit from monochronicity. At the moment it seems to wander around trying to say a lot of different things at the same time. 184.67.135.194 (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)