Talk:Chronological Bible Storying
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Politepunk 12:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC) I have changed 'God's Word' to 'the Bible' as the former wording was written from an explicitly Christian perpsective without explaining that that was the case (e.g., this could have been "... the Bible, which some/many Christians believe to be the word of God.") and, in my opinion, didn't satisfy requirements for NPOV.
NPOV issues can be easily corrected[edit]
It looks to me like CBS get a decent overview here but some of the wording is written fro man explicity christian perspective. I'm going to change around some wording without changing any statements to move the article towards a more neutral point of view. Musing Sojourner (talk) 14:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chronological Bible Storying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426041903/http://wsaresourcesite.org/Topics/historiasbiblicasandes.htm to http://wsaresourcesite.org/Topics/historiasbiblicasandes.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)