Talk:Chrysanthus and Daria
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Legendary Saints Were Real, Buried Alive, Study Hints
[edit]I just came across this interesting article. Should this be added to the article? Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 19:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Saints Chrysanthus and Daria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051129000836/http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintc0n.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintc0n.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Historicity
[edit]- Refs: the same material twice, both not helpful - Nat Geo in English only for subscribers, and in Italian version there's just the heading. Must go on trust - BAD.
- One-sided: one inaccessible source interpreted by one editor.
- Tribune at age 17-18? Hard to imagine, want to see academic discussion.
- No signs for reason of death interpreted as confirmation for suffocation - A. Legend has him drowned, her possibly buried alive, so quite aggressive manhandling for both. If remains only skeletal and no trauma signs visible (arms, neck), many (!) less physically violent death causes would leave even less signs.
Let's say aristocratic young man married away to older woman (up to 7-8 yrs older) is plausible, but those 2 elements (#3 & 4) make the conclusion look very fishy & biased. Arminden (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- Low-importance Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- C-Class Saints articles
- Low-importance Saints articles
- WikiProject Saints articles
- C-Class Egypt articles
- Low-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- C-Class Women in Religion articles
- Low-importance Women in Religion articles