Talk:Chu XP-0

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Chinese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	World War II task force

Edit Warring Over Aircraft Designation[edit]

The history of this aircraft seems to be very little documented. However, that does not negate the need for reliable sources. The history page of this article reveals some light edit warring over the exact designation of this aircraft. Please explain the reason for your changes in this regard with reliable sources when making them. –Noha307 (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When I Google X-PO I get a lot about the aircraft, when I google XP-O I get this page and nothing more, so I assume X-PO is correct. - ZLEA _Talk ^Contribs 18:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lennart Andersson's A History of Chinese Aviation (Andersson, Lennart (2008). A History of Chinese Aviation: Encyclopedia of Aircraft and Aviation in China until 1949. Taipei, Taiwan: AHS of ROC. ISBN 978-957-28533-3-7. lists on p. 243 what appears to be the same type as the XP-0 (0, not O) - noting that the prototype that flew (and crashed) at Kumming in 1943 was the XP-1 which appears to be a different aircraft (with inverted gull wing) than the "more conventional" XP-0, of which 9 were built (2 in 44, 2 in 45 and 5 in 1946).Nigel Ish (talk) 22:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good, a non-internet source is better than an internet source in my opinion. - ZLEA _Talk\^Contribs 23:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]