Talk:Chuck Versus the Last Details/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 18:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

There are only a few minor problems, after fixed, article should make GA no problem.

• 4.099 million viewers, can we round this to 4.1 please, it helps reading (only for the lead, below readers want focus on accuracy).
  •  Done
• The link to "best man" in the plot, is overkill, should be removed.
  •  Done
• Can you rephrase the first sentence of the Production section since those exact words have already been used in the lead.
  •  Done
• Could you subsection the Music and Cultural references under Production, it would look cleaner like that.
  •  Done
• Again, first sentence of Reception is exactly the same as the lead, it's repetitious and needs to be changed.
  •  Done
• Is there no less positive review to be found? It seems slightly biased, if there isn't don't sweat it, but if there is one to be found it should be added.
  • I've added the only somewhat negative review I can find from a semi-reliable source, where the reviewer says that the show's "anything that can go wrong will go wrong" pace is "killing [her, the reviewer,] by inches".
• The References list should be split in 2.
  •  Done. Tell me if there's anything else. --Boycool (talk) 21:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Just needs a few changes here and there, everything is fine in this area.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):

   Perfic'

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Needs a review that focuses more on the negative aspects of the episode, if none are to be found, this will be changed to a pass.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Perfic'.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Comments above.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Fantastic stuff! That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 21:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Boycool (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)