Talk:Churchmead School

Berkshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ofsted reckons that Churchmead is a comprehensive - please see http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/portal/site/Internet/menuitem.7c7b38b14d870c7bb1890a01637046a0/?event=getReport&urn=133580&inspectionNumber=295504&providerCategoryID=8192&fileName=\\school\\133\\s5_133580_20070613.xml (ofsted report of 2-3 May 2007, accessed 5/8/2007) so I have amended the article as appropriate. Grblundell 14:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 5/8/2007[reply]

DCSF says it was a secondary modern in 2002 [1] but in 2003 it became a comprehensive [2]. CR7 21:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding External Link

I believe that www.rhystowey.com should be added to external links as he is a Churchmead Student and it shows the work that Students can/have achieved. It makes the School look better when visitors look at this Wikipedia Article and discover work of Students.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.102.122 (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the wikipedia article isn't meant to show Churchmead in a good light - or in a bad light either. The point of all articles in wikipedia should be to give as unbiased a report as possible of the facts. And external links have to be of substantial relevance. So Rhys's website shouldn't be referenced. Grblundell (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the above link keeps getting added to this article, and others, sometimes from various IPs in the course of a day, and as an "external link". I can only think that this is an attempt to use Wikipedia for spamming, and would recommend the above link be removed on this basis too. Rapido (talk) 15:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Churchmead School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121008081046/http://churchmead.org/cm/ to http://churchmead.org/cm/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dfes.gov.uk/cgi-bin/performancetables/school_06.pl?Mode=Z&No=8684084&Type=LA&Num=868&Phase=k&Year=06&Base=b

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]