Talk:CineTel Films

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Film: Filmmaking / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

California: Los Angeles Stub‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Name[edit]

According to most sources CineTel Films is written as one word: CineTelFilms. --JHvW (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You sure about that? Every reference cited in this article writes it as CineTel Films... exactly like that. Also Google gives only 4060 results for "CineTelFilms" versus "CineTel Films" (in quotes when searching), though it may not be CineTel Films, Inc... —CodeHydro 12:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is inc. but you're right in that its website does use both the one and two word version inconsistently. Just looked at this page [1] and see how it does it both ways. —CodeHydro 12:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right. Just would'nt want to see your article tossed out for such a minor point. As it is "your" article, fair enough to use CineTel Films consistently. --JHvW (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note the legal status of the company isn't generally used: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies). I'm removing it now. tedder (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the policy you cite only applies to the title of the article. I'm undoing your revision since the policy says:

"In any event, in the lead of article itself, the title sentence should include the legal name of the company:
Generic Publishing Corporation Ltd. is one of the largest publishers of widget books worldwide and is based in Anytown, Bookland. The company was founded in 1980 and is perhaps best known for its series of books covering..."

—CodeHydro 14:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Sigh, thrrrrrp." --JHvW (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(deindent) good catch, codehydro. Though it likely shouldn't be in the infobox, according to that. And JHvW, what are you saying? Can you translate to english, please? tedder (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was just reading an article about Don Martin and was thinking how he would have reacted. Maybe not appropriate, apologies if necessary. --JHvW (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CineTel Films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080309184526/http://home.lynx.net/kual/devilwinds_prod.html to http://home.lynx.net/kual/devilwinds_prod.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]