Talk:Circle of stars/Talk Archive 1

I's just want to say that it wasn't my idea to separate out Circle of stars from Crown of Immortality. But as its now an article with star circles, I can't find any argumentation why NOT to include the EU Flag. The only way I see how we could marginalize it is to let the article dwell in art with circles of stars. --Roberth Edberg 19:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Crown of Immortality[edit]

Keep seperate - That would have been possible before when the article were AfD tagged, but now that article has become explicit to Immortality and can't be merged. --Roberth Edberg 11:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seperate - unless a definite connection connection emerges. As I see it there is the religious Apocalypse/Virgin Crown or circle - not connected with Immortality as far as I can see, and a Crown of Immortality - laurel in classical times & stars from some point in the Renaissance. The two are different, and should be maintained as such (unless, as I said, a connection emerges). No connection between either & the EU circle has been demonstrated. Johnbod 13:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on the Apocalypse/Virgin parts as there is no source reference to the connection. I will fix that and maintain those in the Circle of stars instead. --Roberth Edberg 13:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As Crown of Immortality has been improved, and its content is now clearly separated from this article, I withdraw the merge proposal.Paul111 20:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SPAMMED: Fisheater.com[edit]

It seems that the article has been affected by fisheater.com spammers. There is no blacklisted link in the article, and still it reports so. It seems to be a known WIkipedia hacking method. As a Newbee here on WikiPedia I need help! --Roberth Edberg 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More information about it is documented here: User:JzG/Fisheaters.

It was in a ref tag, added by Robert I think - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circle_of_stars&diff=prev&oldid=111825822. Fixed now. Guy (Help!) 15:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How strange, yep It's my name on the add. I thought I added something completly different. Thanks anyhow. --Roberth Edberg 19:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]