Talk:Citheronia regalis

Last Paragraph Gets Preachy

The last paragraph, in its plea for conservation, steps far over the line from encyclopedic to opinion. The opinions expressed are not outrageous or offensive, but are opinions nonetheless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrishibbard7 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, so I just deleted the last paragraph. I think it would be good to add a section about their conservation status and why they are important in the ecosystem or whatnot, but I don't have enough info to do it myself. --TheAlphaWolf (talk) 17:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is calling the color of the caterpillar a 'fetching turquoise' an opinion? LOL Even if it is, please leave it. bpage (talk) 23:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation

I deleted the comments about Bt, DDT, etc as reasons for decline was unsourced and completely speculative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.49.17 (talk) 05:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Citheronia regalis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]