Jump to content

Talk:Citroën C4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The car's advanced technology was the focus of a memorable television advertising campaign showing the car transforming into a giant dancing robot, though this is not a standard feature of the C4 at present. Pity.

does anyone know where one would find a link to that ad?--142.167.131.253 23:57, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The ads are available for download from the UK Citroën C4 website but I'm not sure what a direct URL would be. BigJohnD 03:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)BigJohnD[reply]

Shouldn't we split the two 1.6 HDi engines into two lines? (I would do it, but the code looks so complicated!) SmilingBoy 16:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Negative battery pole - hidden and inaccessible The C4 has a hidden and inaccessible negative battery pole. I've tried to help start another car, and couldn't. With any other car I've ever used, helping others to start when their battery was empty, was easy. Does anyone knows how it can be done with the Citroen C4? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.139.226.37 (talk) 20:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not asembled in Vigo, Spain: http://www.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/en/psa_group/fiche_nom_b5.php?id=105 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cibup (talkcontribs) 20:52, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Faulty Format on Second Generation

[edit]

I tried to fix it but the text on second generation and on is still centered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wroom (talkcontribs) 16:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the promo image of Citroën C4 II

[edit]

Here is a cut and paste from my talk page

Thanks for uploading File:Citroen-c4-2010.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 10:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2005–2008 Citroën C4 hatchback.jpg is a reasonable replacement. Moreover, the article says "The second generation Citroën C4 was presented in June 2010" — if it's been presented, it surely can be photographed. Nyttend (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
a) I guess it's the same in the US as in Europe, there are multiple generations of cars with the same name, you wouldn't illustrate the 2010 Camry with a picture of the 2005 Camry, or the Golf V with the Golf IV. File:2005–2008 Citroën C4 hatchback.jpg is not a reasonable replacement. b) I think I have quite clearly written that the car has been presented, this means that pictures have been distributed to the press, but it has not been shown publicly. The car will be publicly displayed in four months. So please revert your deletion, fair use applies till October 2010. Thanks. Hektor (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You can take a picture of a previous edition and describe the changes in words. Moreover, you could create a composite image from nonfree images that have been distributed publicly; because you'd be using several such images, it wouldn't be a derivative work of any of them. Nyttend (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am the third party; Feydey was the first to dispute its use. Why can't you describe the changes in words? Nyttend (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is a completely different car
Description must rely on reliable sources, not the editor's imression based on few publicity shots (or, worse, inofficial shots that are not reliably confirmed as the real deal). So if there's no third-pary reports on the new C4 (there can't be any at the moment: the prototype was unveiled today, and Citroen has not yet announced when production will commence) there's no desription besides the measurements taken off C's own site. As for the picture: for all practical purposes the new C4 does not exist, so until it ships to dealers - the top spot belongs to current (old) model. Do we need a promo pic in the bottom? I think not. East of Borschov (talk) 06:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Third Ad

[edit]

Music is Hungarian Dances by Bramhs - Ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw70v3YYLPE&feature=related - Hungarian dance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3X9LvC9WkkQ

I'm adding it --190.232.174.188 (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please create individual Wikipedia page for Citroën C4 Aircross SUV

[edit]

Hey everyone, I have request for anyone willing to create a Wikipedia article for the Citroën C4 Aircross SUV. The reason why I am saying this is because the C4 Aircross's replacement, the Citroën C5 Aircross, is due soon for a Chinese and European release. Besides, there is limited information shown on the article talking about the C4 compact. Please create another webpage for the C4 Aircross. Thanks and I appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2E1C:8600:6C3D:8407:A3CA:7866 (talk) 06:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citroën C4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Citroën C4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]