Talk:City Football Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion?[edit]

This company doesn't exist in the manner depicted.

It was the name of the company setup to purchase Manchester City PLC by Sheikh Mansour. It has no other purpose, board of directors or investments. Pamsunch (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ADIA[edit]

The ADUG is part of the ADIA. I know very little about business and the murky world of investment, but I suspect that the relationship may warrant the two articles being merged. Someone with a bit more information may like to investigate this. Certainly the relationship needs to be commented upon, is it just a holding company? If so, is it independent enough to warrant a second article? Rje (talk) 01:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Headquarters[edit]

The HQ of CFG is actually in London, not the Etihad Campus. Confirmed on the CFG website: Registered office: Regent's Place 14th Floor, 10 Brock Street, London, NW1 3FG.[1] Also mentioned in regards to a trespass injunction In relation to City Football Group’s properties in England (including the Etihad Stadium, City Football Academy and the Group’s offices in London). SixFourThree (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

san antonio fc[edit]

source that the relationship between nycfc and san antonio fc has been terminated? Southbronxbombers (talk) 00:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no source and there was no termination. The partnerships were only for one season at a time and there's been absolutely no sign of co-operation between the two teams since the first half of 2018. If you can find any sources to say that the two clubs are still co-operating then I'd be the first to list the partnership as active again. Falastur2 ^Talk 21:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Palermo[edit]

Palermo football club — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palermotanopazzo (talk • contribs) 09:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: It seems certain that Palermo will join CFG but until the deal is actually confirmed, it can't be added. Reports say that the deal will be announced on Saturday, so we'll probably add it then. Falastur2 ^Talk 18:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Man City[edit]

Yaya 41.223.213.112 (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kolo 82.33.139.144 (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

This page reads more like an advertisement for the group than an encyclopaedic article. 77.248.25.135 (talk) 14:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very much agreed, there is no mention of the heavy criticism CFG gets from football fans and smaller clubs 108.18.115.19 (talk) 20:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]