Talk:City of Port Adelaide Enfield
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Infobox Update
[edit]This page has had its infobox updated to Infobox Australian Place. This update has been automatically preformed by TheJoshBot. Please be aware that poorly filled templates can have infomation lost in the transition that is unknown to the bot. Check the page history for more infomation. The following infomation has been lost in the transition, and will need to be converted to the document prose:
Field Name | Field Value |
---|---|
ausborn | 69.3 |
atsi | 2.2 |
deputymayor |
Mayor is Gary Johanson.
[edit]Now, the City of Port Adelaide Enfield's Mayor is Mayor Gary Johanson. See this page "http://www.portenf.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=156" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Namnoh7 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC).
Fair use rationale for Image:PAE.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:PAE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Updated list of suburbs in PAE, Feb 2016
[edit]Source: maps.sa.gov.au/plb Donama (talk) 04:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Alberton
- Angle Park
- Birkenhead
- Blair Athol
- Broadview (part in Prospect)
- Clearview
- Croydon Park
- Dernancourt (part in Tea Tree Gully)
- Devon Park (part in Charles Sturt)
- Dry Creek (part in Salisbury)
- Dudley Park
- Enfield
- Ethelton
- Exeter
- Ferryden Park
- Gepps Cross
- Gilles Plains (part in Tea Tree Gully)
- Gillman
- Glanville
- Greenacres
- Hampstead Gardens
- Hillcrest
- Holden Hill (part in Tea Tree Gully)
- Kilburn
- Klemzig
- Largs Bay
- Largs North
- Manningham
- Mansfield Park
- New Port
- North Haven
- Northfield
- Northgate
- Oakden
- Osborne
- Ottoway
- Outer Harbor
- Peterhead
- Port Adelaide
- Prospect (most part in Prospect)
- Queenstown
- Regency Park
- Rosewater
- Sefton Park (part in Prospect)
- Semaphore
- Semaphore South
- Taperoo
- Valley View (part in Salisbury, part in Tea Tree Gully)
- Walkley Heights (part in Salisbury)
- Windsor Gardens
- Wingfield
- Woodville Gardens
Separate articles for City of Enfield and City of Port Adelaide?
[edit]Hi there, anyone think we could break out the articles for City of Enfield (1933-1996) and City of Port Adelaide (1855-1996) now that I've put a bit more into the History section here and made it a bit heavier than the rest of the article? The history of the two is completely separate prior to the merger in 1996 and it's clunky for other articles to link via the redirects to the history section here. See City of Playford (formed from merger of City of Elizabeth and City of Munno Para in 1997) for a similar case. Any thoughts? Donama (talk) 05:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Please do! It is my intention to do this for all of South Australia eventually, but I decided to start with the north and west because the metropolitan boundaries changed so much and got too confusing for an outsider. It is impossible to have any kind of useful reference to local government in any state prior to the 1990s if you try to merge them all into the modern mega-councils: it just winds up being covered really badly if at all unless you break them out. The only thing is that I'd be careful about the increased likelihood of boundary changes in the interim, and you might want a couple more overarching recent sources than what I've been using, which is building articles from Trove, Susan Marsden's early history study, the digitised 1936 civic record, and any info about more modern mergers. But it's much harder to bugger up what exactly was where when for the District Council of Carrieton than the City of Port Adelaide! The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Okay :) Btw where is the digitised 1936 civic record if I may ask? Donama (talk) 23:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- It is here. It is a godsend for historic LGAs: it contains profiles of every single LGA that existed in 1936 to varying depths. If you're doing the very early Port Adelaide-area LGAs (e.g. Portland Estate) you'll also need Susan Marsden's pre-1936 councils research paper because they were all gone by then. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Okay :) Btw where is the digitised 1936 civic record if I may ask? Donama (talk) 23:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on City of Port Adelaide Enfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150403000805/https://www.portenf.sa.gov.au/page.aspx?u=333 to http://www.portenf.sa.gov.au/page.aspx?u=333
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on City of Port Adelaide Enfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516021154/http://www.planning.sa.gov.au/edp/pdf/pade.pdf to http://www.planning.sa.gov.au/edp/pdf/pade.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)