Talk:Civil–military administrations (Ukraine)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Future reference: new military and civil administration in Luhansk region created on 12 August 2016[edit]

Read more on UNIAN: here. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 15:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civil–military administrations (Ukraine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kryvyi Rih[edit]

In the article for Kryvyi Rih, it is mentioned that a civil-military administration was created for the community on Feb 27, 2022. However, the link to this is dead. Why was one introduced for Kryvyi Rih? And then just more generally, we need a "Background" section in this article to better described WHY this legislation was proposed and approved. Is it that the government was wary of particular mayors and councillors in certain areas carrying out the law of the country like it was supposed to? That some mayors are viewed as not being amendable to the goals of the central government during a time or war/crisis? There is no explanation or reason given in the article why the regular council of that community/raion/oblast could not be expected to carry out the task that a civil-military administration is tasked with carrying out.

It strikes me as obvious why a civil-military administration was implemented in places like Donestk and Luhasnk, with their administrative centers occupied and not under government control. It is much less clear to me why one has been implemeneted for Kryvyi Rih City, which has not been occupied nor captured, and which had an acting mayor and city council to continue to oversee its administration. --Criticalthinker (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]