Talk:Civil Air Patrol/GA1
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- I fixed a few acronym inconsistencies, and tagged an unclear statement.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- I left one citation tag for a paragraph that wasn't cited at all.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Really close. In addition to the tags I left, The age of the audio recording concerns me. ON HOLD for up to a week for the minor improvements needed. Jclemens (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have addressed your concerns. I hope it now fully meets the criteria. — scetoaux (T|C) 22:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Really close. In addition to the tags I left, The age of the audio recording concerns me. ON HOLD for up to a week for the minor improvements needed. Jclemens (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
