Talk:Civmec

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 26 December 2020, see discussion.
delete, November 9, 2020, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Civmec is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Article reinstated[edit]

Article that was previously successfully nominated for deletion was this one which was carried on the basis that it clearly self promotional relying on the company's own website and not many independent sources. The reinstated version, relies solely on secondary sources; three news organisations, namely the Australian Financial Review, The West Australian and ABC News, and one trade publication. Zeddeer (talk) 03:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]