This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
The paragraph with the quotes praising the Claremont Review reads like an advertisement. Rjhatl (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It does, but if I had been asked to write this article and knew of those quotes there is no way I would have left them out. TCR is a truly exceptional publication and I cannot think of a better way to indicate that than by quoting a few of its famous readers. 71.194.39.143 (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Larry Siegel[reply]
This is an atrocious advertorial. No encyclopedic article should consist of a lede paragraph that is basically one enormous quote from the subject of the article itself. And it goes without saying, the rest is just as bad.
