Jump to content

Talk:ClearRx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disposal

[edit]

How do I dispose of these rings in an environmentally friendly way? To the best of my knowledge they are not recyclable, Target will not take them back [I've asked] and I have hundreds of them - I refuse to send them to the landfill. Was this taken into consideration during the design process: millions of rubber rings being sent to the dump? My mother was the only one at home and they still insisted she have the color coding; seems wasteful. Suggestions, anyone? Thank you.Allyson53 (talk) 02:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Is anyone else uncomfortable with this page providing undue emphasis on a corporate product? Ie Target's ClearRx

[edit]

I didn't post this heading, and I'm not sure who did, but I am equally baffled. Why IS this content here? Revision history shows it was merged in some time ago, but I cannot find any discussion about it. Nobody else's prescription bottle designs are being discussed here, and even if it didn't read like an advertisement, I don't think it'd have any particular place here.2602:306:80B3:DB00:D496:6569:3284:ACC (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not like this content here. It is WP:UNDUE for discussion of this general concept and I think that it fits better into its own article. @WikiRedactor and Samuel Wiki: Both of you participated in merging this content to here. Can you say something about why? How would you feel about my moving it back to its own article? Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On March 23 2017 this article, ClearRx, was merged to prescription bottle. The IP comment was originally posted to the talk page of "prescription bottle". I am moving "ClearRx" back to its own article, and also copying this comment from that talk page to here. I am doing this as part of an effort to clean up the "prescription bottle" and the pharmaceutical packaging articles. "ClearRx" is just a minor product in that context and I do not think it should be mentioned. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're doin' good work, Rasberry. Thank you. 2602:306:80B3:DB00:D19F:21F3:A62F:A488 (talk) 00:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]