Talk:Clearlake Oaks, California
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clearlake Oaks, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/68hmXDfkx?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
change image[edit]
The original image did not illustrate the subject as it could have been taken anywhere. So as per MOS:PERTINENCE I have added a much more relevant one. Domdeparis (talk) 16:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Well done, sincere thanks! That lovely image, as you know, was not available until today, or I would have used it long ago. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Domdeparis's image deleted - any other ideas? I just hate to see any article unillustrated. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- as per MOS:IMAGES illustrations are not necessary and especially not family photos that could have been taken in front of a house anywhere in the world. The images have to pertinent and of educational value. Yours was not. I tried to find a pertinent free image. I suggest you do the same. Domdeparis (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That's what I meant. There you go again arguing absolete stuff --SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- gosh sorry I thought I was being clear, I'll simplify it.. You asked for suggestions.my suggestion is: do not add that non pertinent image again and try and find another that is. Hope that's clearer now. Domdeparis (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, golly we're both being unclear, and on the Clearlake talk of all places! I meant suggestions for another better photo that the one I added when there was none. Wouldn't that be obvious to anyone, since I thanked you sincerely for that replacement? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- gosh sorry I thought I was being clear, I'll simplify it.. You asked for suggestions.my suggestion is: do not add that non pertinent image again and try and find another that is. Hope that's clearer now. Domdeparis (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That's what I meant. There you go again arguing absolete stuff --SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- as per MOS:IMAGES illustrations are not necessary and especially not family photos that could have been taken in front of a house anywhere in the world. The images have to pertinent and of educational value. Yours was not. I tried to find a pertinent free image. I suggest you do the same. Domdeparis (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Domdeparis's image deleted - any other ideas? I just hate to see any article unillustrated. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- the article appears to conflate Clearlake Oaks with Clearlake where the Walmart is located
"Clear Lake Keys, California" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect Clear Lake Keys, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § Clear Lake Keys, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
"Clear Lake Keys" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect Clear Lake Keys has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 29 § Clear Lake Keys until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris talk! 00:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)