Talk:Clozee

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Clozee article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing[edit]

All the sources are independent and again she has a wikipedia in french. clozee Artedm (talk) 16:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Artedm asked for a third opinion on this dispute, which I declined as this has not been "thoroughly discussed" to the point that it has "come to a standstill. Artedm, could you be more specific about which notability guideline is passed here? MurielMary, do you dispute that the sources are independent? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:49, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi see Notability_(music) all the sources are independent and this same musician has a wiki in french where she is from. Artedm (talk) 18:54, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Artedm, of the independent sources, which three do you think are the most reliable and contain the most non-trivial coverage of CloZee? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:17, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

source 1. westword 4. grammy 15. dancing astronaut 16. edm.com 17. dj mag. The french wiki has 19 sources but different language. Artedm (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my assessment on the sources is below. @MurielMary: care to weigh in, or have you about hit your limit on this draft? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I marked this as a stub also see Wikipedia:Notability_(music) Artedm (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that the sources provided show sufficient significant coverage of the subject to publish this draft in mainspace. MurielMary (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, MM. Artedm, you can wait on a new AfC reviewer to weigh in, or you can move the article to mainspace yourself, expecting that it might then be nominated for deletion. For what it's worth, I'd vote to Keep based on the sources in the table + the Billboard feature you just added to the draft. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help Artedm (talk) 16:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The djmag article beyond the cover is detailed at [1], so this looks to be significant coverage. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessed back to Stub, since it's about as much as a dictionary definition at this point. Can be filled out a little more to make it Start-class. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:09, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Artedm, please let AFC reviewers review drafts and handle the moving to mainspace. When the originating draft editor does this despite being pushed back to draft twice, it looks really bad and is much more likely to be deleted with create-protection. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AngusW🐶🐶F Thank you for the feedback Artedm (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
Westword		Part interview but definitely has significant secondary coverage	✔ Yes
Grammy		The non-interview coverage amounts to a slim paragraph	✘ No
Dancing Astronaut		Part interview but definitely has significant secondary coverage	✔ Yes
EDM.com	? Site doesn't give us much to work with at its About page and it's not listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music#Reliable	Part interview but definitely has significant secondary coverage	? Unknown
DJ Mag	? DJ Mag is great, but this is just a teaser for the cover story in the magazine. If someone has access to the actualy story (or can spare the $5 to buy the digital version of the mag), I assume it's a solid source.	~ Fairly brief (but this is just the teaser)	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.