Jump to content

Talk:Club Penguin/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Any comments are welcome. LegoKontribsTalkM 22:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    The section about Child safety seems more like an advertisment even though all of them have proper citations. From that section:
    The system uses a number of different approaches in order to maintain a high level of security. The key approaches include:
    To me, "high level" is POV.
    Fixed
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Semi-protection is for ip vandalism
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    On hold until criterion #4 is fixed. Passed, as #4 has been fixed.

LegoKontribsTalkM 23:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for that. I've reworded the child safety section so that it isn't a POV as it was - you were definitely correct about the wording. :) I considered moving some of the criticism into Child safety, (to join the "Orwellian dystopia" reference which was already there), but I thought that it may be better left in the "Reception and criticism" section. I'm happy to move it in there if you think it will provide more balance, though. - Bilby (talk) 03:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]