Talk:Cluniac Reforms

Vandalism

This article was vandalized. I have attempted to put it back the way it was before, but had to go back two edits to do it. DeVeritate 19:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cluniac Reforms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080628050934/http://faculty.ucc.edu/egh-damerow/papal_monarchy.htm to http://faculty.ucc.edu/egh-damerow/papal_monarchy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

So what were the reforms?

Very little information in this article. We are told the conditions that made reforms necessary, and some effects of the reforms, but we are never told what the reforms actually were. 2001:558:6011:1:10B0:5FF8:FC2A:415C (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

I agree that this is a stub article with limited information. The lead says that the reform "focused on restoring the traditional monastic life, encouraging art, and caring for the poor". I am not well informed about the reform on the Continent, but I did a lot of work on the English Benedictine Reform, where it was focussed on replacing secular clerks who were allowed to marry with unmarried monks. Strict obedience to monastic rules and encouragement of art and learning were important but, compared with the secular clergy, caring for the poor and the provision of religious services for the laity were less important. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)