Talk:Coal tit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coal tit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great tit image on Coal tit page is confusing in Google Images[edit]

Hi all

If you google this: "coal tit wiki" and look at images, the second hit is a Great tit, with caption "Coal tit - Wikipedia".

It seems that the Great tit image, although of interest about the historical confusion between the species, has too much prominence and is likely causing confusion now.

I suggest removing the Great tit image entirely, and just describe the issue and maintain the link to the Great tit article.

Wikibrumblue (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh G*d! Brilliant spot. My first reaction = "tough ****, this has nothing to do with us" ... followed by "aargh, it's awful, we must fix it!" In other words, it is a stupid problem but a real one, and as we can't fix Google's foolishnesss, Wikibrumblue is probably right and we should fix it from our end in order to Do The Right Thing by grillions of people Out There. It's annoying but yes! What do others think? DBaK (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]