Talk:Coat of arms of Cimișlia/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 05:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Starting review. Hope to have some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- GACR#1a. Well written: the prose is clear, concise and understandable.
- GACR#1a. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
- GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
- GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
- GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
- GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
- GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
- GACR#2a. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
- GACR#2b. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
- GACR#2b. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
- GACR#2b. All quotations are cited and their usage complies with MOS guidelines – not applicable.
- GACR#2c. No original research.
- GACR#2d. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
- GACR#3. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
- GACR#4. Neutral (NPOV).
- GACR#5. Stable.
- GACR#6a. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.
- GACR#6b. Images are relevant to the topic with appropriate captions.
I'll be using the checklist above to register progress. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Pass[edit]
As with your article on the city's flag, this is entirely within scope and has been well written, fully and reliably sourced, and checks all the criteria. It is unquestionably a good article and so, again, I'm promoting it to GA status. Well done. All the best and keep safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)