Jump to content

Talk:Code of Vengeance/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: no disambiguations found

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I made a few copy-edits - mostly needed commas.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources, which support the cited statements.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Sufficient detail without trivia.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Three images used, with suitable tags and captions
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Well, I can't find anything wrong with this; I judge that it meets the GA criteria and will list it accordingly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]