Jump to content

Talk:Coldwaltham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





Please! I am going to expand on this page to turn it into a wealth of knowledge I hope to do this over the coming weeks, please don't delete it. Zesty Prospect 21:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on! Whoever put this up for speedy deletion is an imbacile. I have been to Coldwaltham manyer time. It is near Pulborough and Petworth, land of the incesed. This article is only a start and it will no doubt be expanded into a decnt article for a village in West Sussex. --Soopa hoops77 21:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Watersfield to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 08:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coldwaltham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]