Jump to content

Talk:Collinsville, Connecticut

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Separate NRHP HD article or not

[edit]

A bunch of editors have been debating when and where it is helpful to have separate articles on NRHP HDs, like about "Collinsville Historic District", vs. when it is best to include the NRHP info in an article about a village/hamlet/neighborhood like this "Collinsville (Canton, Connecticut)" article.

Some of the editors (me included) agree that for Collinsville HD we currently want a merged article. But if there is someone who wants to make a decent separate article, that would be okay too. We just ask, please don't split out a separate NRHP HD article unless a) you have created or are actively developing a DYK-equivalent length starter article using substantial information, and b) you judge in good faith that it is beneficial to have the NRHP HD be a separate article.

Note, for all CT NRHPs, a good source is available, the NRHP nomination document, provided free of charge upon email request to nr_reference (at) nps.gov. And, in December 2010, the National Register has just made available online copies of almost all of the NRHP documents for CT: see search screen here.

For now, "Collinsville Historic District" redirects to "Collinsville". (Equivalent notice being placed at Talk:Collinsville Historic District.) --doncram (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collinsville, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]