Talk:Color Air
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Color Air has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 9, 2009. |
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Color Air/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Airplaneman ✈ 20:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- I'll do a huge copy edit to tweak some of the wording, since a first read through is fine. I believe I can do them because they are extremely minor stylistic/grammatical issues.
- Tweak of infobox & lead (please fact-check the infobox-I got the info from the prose)
- Fixes to "service" section
- Finish copyedit
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Checklinks clean. After reading, I could only find a claim to Color being the first low-cost airline once; the first sentence in the lead. I might have overlooked it, but it should be mentioned in the "Establishment" section as well, with a ref. Otherwise, suitably referenced.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Great
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- OK
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- OK
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I like the images :). The only problem is that File:Color Air Logo.png does not contain non-free use rationale, which can be found at WP:FUG.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Additional comments
An enjoyable read. Placing on hold for the two issues (regarding logo and claim to be first low cost Norwegian airline) to be addressed. Airplaneman ✈ 20:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, and not least the extra effort of copyediting; some times articles just don't end up all that well written. The logo has been rationalized [sic]. Imagine—we could get away with those types of fair use rationales a few years ago. I've also found an existing source which claims the article to be the first low-cost carrier, so I added a sentence there. Arsenikk (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Alright; looks good, will pass! Airplaneman ✈ 21:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- GA-Class aviation articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- GA-Class Norway articles
- WikiProject Norway articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles