Talk:Columbian half dollar/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 11:35, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I am passing this article. Here are my two nitpicks:

"of organizers of the Columbian Exposition to gain" - how about "Columbian Exposition organizers" to avoid the many "of"s?
"Company's Committee on Liberal Arts" - maybe define "liberal arts" --Tomcat (7) 15:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't see those, will do. A link rather than a def for the second one.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]